I will cheerfully "arrange for one" for him anytime.
Nope.
- The judge stated he was not qualified to determine whether it was an explosive or not.
- The judge deferred to the government agency as the "defacto expert" (which we happen to know from experience is not the case in practice).
- The only test report ever done on consumer propellants conclusively determined it does not have explosive properties in the quantities used for amateur motors.
- I can prove it.
Separate issue.
Then you must be someone like Ky Michaelson.
Writing on the wall is NOT the point. The law as written is.
The exemption is real, present, and has been for decades.
Deal with it.
Or not! :)
You post a lot like Ray Dunakin. You use his style of logic and fact citation.