Lexington carrier

Oct 02, 2004 5 Replies

Hi all. I was looking through my Squadron mailer, and came across a Fujimi Lexington CV2 carrier in 1/700 scale. It says in their description this is the ww2 version, so I'm wondering if this is the same as the one docked in Corpus Christi. My dad has always wanted a model of that carrier, since we've toured it several times. Thanks for any info.



Randy IPMS Houston



We're living in a world that's been pulled over our eyes to blind us from the truth. Where are you, white rabbit?



Randy. CV-2 was built before WW II and was one of the original carriers used to develop carrier operations before the war. Aircraft were colorful bi-planes. The ship was modified and had a different configuration for WW II action. She was sunk at the Battle of Coral Sea. CV-16, an Essex class Carrier was originally to be named Cabot. This was changed to Lexington after CV-2 was Sunk. CV-16 was launched in Sept 1942. In 1955 CV-16 underwent major modifrications which included addition of an angled flight deck. This is th ship on display. So neither CV-2 or CV-16 in WW II configuration would represent the ship you visited.

Val Kraut

In addition, there aren't many models available of "modernized" Essex-class carriers. Revell once did one that was actually issued as Lexington (CV-16) but this kit was based on another ship in the class and isn't accurate as a model of Lexington. Otherwise, there is Lindberg's kit of the Antietam (if that's still around).

Stephen "FPilot" Bierce/IPMS #35922 "I want some positive proof that a few million more dead Americans is a Bad Thing. Because if you go by the advertising, the American nation is the most deserving of genocide there has ever been."--Tepid 9:19

That early angle deck era seems to be totally neglected. Given some of the colorful markings on Aircraft from the Viet Nam era - especially the Corairs IIs it would be an interesting era for carrier models. Renwal also did an angled deck version of ShangraLa, not sure how accurate it was but the deck detail was kind of heavy handed.

Val Kraut

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required