Re: New 1/48 Hasegawa AV-8B?

Aug 21, 2003 7 Replies



>I thought that I read somewhere that Hasegawa is releasing a new tool 1/48
>AV-8B Harrier. Anyone know if that's true?

Yes, it's true.


Kelly Quirk President IPMS/West Central Missouri Show Me State Modelers

formatting link
Show Me State Scale Model Show Saturday September 20, 2003 Kansas City, Missouri Ask me for details!


Jeff, Should be out in Sept/Oct time frame. Ray Lloyd IPMS#36878 FREMONT HORNETS "If the enemy is in range, so are you"

I believe the kit is the Monogram tooling, HLJ has it listed under Hasegawa/Monogram, follow the link below. Regards RallyV.

formatting link

If that link don't work goto

formatting link
and type harrier into the search option.

No, no, no, no!!! The model you've found is indeed old Monogram kit, but Hasegawa is going to release their own NET TOOLING AV-8B!!! New kit will arrive later this year.

It is the same as they did with F-8E Crusader - they were also selling Monogram kit for many years and now they released their own new tooling.

-- Regards, Pawel

Visit my webpage:

formatting link
reviews, galleries etc.

I can't remember where I saw the box art (or catalogue art) for it, but the NEW TOOL AV-8B is the one with the radar nose and the long fin intake. And about time too. (Hope they don't mould the airbrake closed like they seem to on their 72 scale versions. But then, they did on the 1/48 Crusader. Oh, the suspense!) Chek

Here is a link to a picture of the box art on Hasegawa's site. It is due for release in Oct in Japan. Like the new F-8 Crusader it has a new item # PT28. All of the monogram kits that Hase has released have been coded HM not PT.

formatting link

PT28 (07228) Scale : 1/48 Category :Modern British Tactical Attacker (sic) Estimated No. of parts : 150 Markings : U.S. Marine VMA-231 "ACE OF SPADES" SQN. C.O. code : CG01 Nov.,

2001

I'm very happy to be wrong. The picture shows a long nosed Av8B plus.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required