Revell-Monogram bargains

I've recently re-discovered the older Revell and Monogram kits, and
they're some of the last true bargains around, in my opinion. I
recently finished the 1/48 F-105G and it came out beautifully, and am
now working on their 1/48 F-106. I picked that one up at Michael's
craft store for about $15, and the only after-market I'm going to use
is a set of decals.
I love these kits. They're not over-engineered; they're well-detailed
and inexpensive. And, I actually like the raised panel lines, the
disadvantage being some of them are lost during filling/sanding. Oh
well, I don't care. I'm having fun again!
If you're in a rut in this hobby, with the over-priced, over-
engineered and ill-fitting kits today, return to your roots and try
out some Century-series jets from Revell/Monogram. It's working for
me.
peace, david
Reply to
David Young
Loading thread data ...
Lost raised panel lines can be restored with some streched sprue. A bit fiddly but do-able I think. Easier than sanding off -all- the panel lines and rescribing. ;)
Reply to
rfranklin
Agree 100% David. After the frustration and swearimng generated by the poor quality and attrocious fit of an Airfix Canberra B(I)8 in 1:48, I have regained my sanity by starting a Monogram Fokker D.VII. Everything fits, same as their Camel I did recently. I build models for fun, not to spend hours buried in reference works and adding parts that can only be seen with a microscope and dentist's mirror
Tony Chch NZ
Reply to
Stadia
My favorite from this series is the T-6
Reply to
Mike
Ocidental from Portugal did a nice T-6 if you see one around. Did one a while back in RNZAF markings and have an Aurora one in stash although that has insignia location moulded in which will mean careful removal.
Tony.
Reply to
Stadia
Fantastic. If I get overwhelmed with my stash and kits with too many parts, I always go home to a basic Revell, Monogram airplane or a basic Tamiya 1/35 armor kit. They always work and never cause problems.
Craig
Reply to
Musicman59
I went back to Michael's and they had Monogram's 1/48 B-58. I have wanted to build that thing forever, so much so that I set aside my F-106 and dived into the B-58 immediately. It's going to be a beauty, and once again it's simply engineered. Sure, there'll be some filling, but I think just about every kit I've build has some.
peace, david
Reply to
David Young
Just to make you grind your teeth I recommend picking up a copy of the November issue of Scale Aircraft Modelling. Many pages devoted to the B-58 and to the Monogram model of same. The cover blurb says it all, "Monogram's venerable 1:48th Hustler gets rescribed", so you know where they're going with that.... ;) Still, there's lot's of photo's of the real thing and a nice colour porofile that might be useful for us OOB types.
I've got a number of pairs of kit where I have the ancient Revell or Hasegawa vs the spiffy new Trumpeter or what ever. It is my aim, (should I live long enough), to build these kits in tandem. I'm thinking that the newer kits will be prettier but the old ones will be more fun.
Reply to
rfranklin
OOB-type. Yep, that's me. I've done my share of resin and scratch- building, and I've put all that aside. About the only thing I'll add nowadays, if I'm building a jet, is (occasionally) a resin ejection seat. But I don't even do that all the time. In fact, I'm using the kit seat for the F-106 and adding *nothing* to the B-58. I'll concentrate on shading for the metallic finish.
Thanks for the tips.
peace, david
Reply to
David Young

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.