Still no reason to launch the kind of verbal attack you seem so fond of.
MBQ
Still no reason to launch the kind of verbal attack you seem so fond of.
MBQ
It would be nice if the English language was the precise instrument you seem to think, but it isn't. More than one person misunderstood. The level of rudeness in your response was more than can be justified by impatience with the lack of understanding, and I'm not sure you're entitled to that at the beginning of a newsgroup conversation.
E
In the simple question I asked it was and still is more than precise.
More than one person misunderstood. The
It wasn't at the beginning.
He tried the same thing relatively recently on uk.rec.cars.classic and was told the same thing, basically to go away. Unfortunately, people like him keep trolling because others reply to him. If he was totally ignored and no-one "spoke" to him at all he'd get fed up and pi55 off!
Oh, and for what it's worth, I interpreted the context of "passing" to mean that they (or it) passed me, not each other. "I saw a deltic passing... passing what? Why, me, of course!"
Badger.
Oh look, the moron trolls offering support to each other when caught in the headlights of their ignorance!
Ignorance doesn't illuminate, it denies illumination.
He does it *everywhere*, eventually, and then lies low for a while, or goes elsewhere.
MBQ
Talking about yourself again I see.
The absence of any denial of your behaviour pattern on Usenet speaks volumes.
When did you stop beating your wife and raping your kids?...
He does it *everywhere*, eventually, and then lies low for a while, or goes elsewhere.
Yes, some people do show up the morons, trolls and wanker like you in what ever groups people like you infest...
I don't need to deny because it's patently obvious that you made up your assertions.
Your behaviour on Usenet, however, is plain for all to see, thanks to the Google archives.
MBQ
I am not missing the point at all, I was saying that based on the totality of your posts, no-one would have expected to need to read that one so very carefully.
And while we're on the difference between singular and plural, that should have been "there weren't any".
"to which"
The reaction of others, while different from mine, suggests that they had the same basic opinion.
E
I don't need to deny because it's patently obvious that you made up your assertions.
Your behaviour on Usenet, however, is plain for all to see, thanks to the Google archives.
As is the context, but trolls like you don't like putting things into context. BTW, just because you have not admitted to beating your wife and raping your kids doesn't mean that you don't, so I'll ask again - when are you going to stop beating your wife and raping your kids?
I don't do either.
Prove it then, if you can't it means that you must beat your wife and rape your kids - of course I can prove the context to the messages I post to Usenet - as you say - it's all recorded in Google archives...
As for your other point, after you Sir.
..
No, I choose not to, at least to you.
Why don't you prove you don't require medication to control your behaviour. If you can't then it means you must require the med and you obviously haven't been taking it recently.
Indeed, the context of the personal abuse directed at someone who simply misunderstood what you said.
MBQ
It is a good job I KFed him before because if he said it to me I'd do what someone else did to a tr011 when they found out who it was, lets put it this way, a particular newgroup is now t***l free because a victim found the home address and phone number of a t***l and when ever it starts - guess the rest - I was watching from the sidelines.
Don't have much beyond screen names and t***l names.
Abuse report forwarded to Demon.
I remember it sittig at Beamish - where has it got to now?
On reflection, a C (J21), an M or R (D17 or D20) and maybe a A or an O (F8 or G5), plus an E1 (J72) would pretty well cover any number of very modellable NER and ex-NER lines over many years. Probably the C, R and O for the wisdest period appeal, as there seems to be more of a preference for post-nationalisation than pre-grouping..
Brain fart there... sorry.
Now that I'd not known..
Certainly - I didn't expect you to comprehend.
Hmm, nothing left to reply too...
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required