Also don't forget that the interior of Postal vehicles was Post-Office territory and absolutely a "no-go" area for other than PO staff. It was intended to not be through-accessible. As such, making it compatible and then locking the door would be silly.
I see no reason to believe TPO carraiges would contain post but no persons. I therefore assume any robber would have planned the caper. I also assume any robber would stop the train. But you assume offset of connections where a robber would have to reach an extra 2 feet to the side would make a difference in the opening of a door. By the way, do you know if the TPO end door had a lock access from the outside.
But as the TPO's were designed and built by the railway company a few years before passenger coaches with coach connections then TPO's would have to have been modified to make them compatible.
Would you like to try suggesting the coach connections on passenger coaches were made with central connections so that they were not compatible with TPO's.
Some people think that which came first the chicken or the egg doesnt have an obvious answer.
- PO sorting vehicles were initially designed with off-set connections because: a. that suited the internal layout of sorting coaches. b. because access to other PO vehicles was desirable.
- Passenger coaches were designed with centralized corridor connections because that position makes them all compatible without turning individual coaches.
- PO vehicles were not redesigned to match because: a. no through connection was required or desirable. b. because relocating would mess up the sorting carriage internal design. c. ?
My original point was a. immediately above, stated in different words. Others here have said b. immediately above was the main purpose.
IMHO other questions such as whether normal locks were adequate or if passenger vehicle connections were centralized to make them incompatible are like asking "what if cats were dogs and dogs were cats?" ;-)
Perhaps but it was in a different context - specifically you were not aware of the time difference of the passenger vs TPO coach build nor which came first.
Well, almost but .... PO sorting vehicles were designed with connections because: b. because access to other PO vehicles was desirable.
The connections were offset because :- a. that suited the internal layout of sorting coaches.
However cant accept following for LNWR as
The position of the internal corridor on one side of the coach meant that these coaches were handed. For the first few years the LNWR always marshalled these coaches with the internal corridor on the same side. Consequently they would have been compatible anyway. Also if I remember correctly another poster pointed out that GWR passenger coaches started with offset connections that were later changed to central ones.
I definitely had assumed that Passenger corridor connections came first. In that situation, the author who wrote the bit about PO corridor connections being made different to disallow through connections made complete sense. Sufficient for me not to reconsider the situation for 50 years.
I'm an L&YR fan - didn't even know about the LNWR coaches. (What's GWR???) ;-)
Nothing to do with my Great something Grandfather by any chance? (bloke named G.Stephenson) My lot came from Bradford and surrounds and my Grandmother worked on the L&Y ambulance trains in WWI, so I won't be switching until I finish building that train at least. I do have a Fleischmann HO Warship, Bullied coaches and several rebuilt Lima BR 33s. My Dad went to the same school as Bullied, but a few years later. (Roseneath Wellington, NZ)
Still doesn't ring a bell - the place somebody left isn't that exciting.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.