>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >>> >> lindberg has release their jn-4 kit. typically lindberg sparse in the = >coc=3D
>> >kpit,
>> >> the outside is very well done and it isn't hard to scratch up some gut= >s. =3D
>> >they
>> >> are very easy to rig, you can lay out a simple pattern, drill some hol= >es =3D
>> >and
>> >> simply sew the rigging together. then you just trim of uneeded wires, = >tou=3D
>> >ch up
>> >> the holes and paint.
>> >> aside from a lack of jn-4 kits, the best price of this one is it's 10 = >buc=3D
>> >ks!
>> >> i've done 2 over the past week and wnat to pick up several more. while= > th=3D
>> >ere
>> >> is a floatplane, extra long wing version out there, it is way pricey. = >for
>> >> about 1/3 the price, i can use the fsm article to make a great one.
>> >> we don' need no steenkin hunnert dollar jennys!
>>
>> >Ray Rimmell of Windsock has reviewed it, calling it one of the best
>> >and most accurate WW1 kits, before the Eduard/Roden flood we're all >> >enjoying.
>> >And this kit has made more comebacks than Cher.
>>
>> got a url? i'd like to read that. it is a real joy to build because it fi= >ts
>> and looks right. some 3rd party should do a cockpit and motor.
>
>No, it's from the print edition, about 20 years back.
>What surprises me is that no one's done a decal sheet. Blue Rider had
>a very handsome 1/72 sheet of Canadian/Texan training Jennies, a dozen >or so.
>Not to mention the barnstorming Jennies, and why Lindberg hasn't done
>one of them instead of the same old Love Field USAS. They could copy
>the old Renwall Aeroskin Heddon Jenny paper sheet.
>
formatting link
'd love better decals.