Revell U-Boat

I see from the latest Hannants email list that, (and I quote):
"...Also please note that the first production run of 10,000 has been
sold by Revell. This kit has the largest plastic part (one piece hull)
Revell have ever moulded and they have mis-calulated the price so it
will increase by £10.00 on February 1st. Please get it on order to be
sure you get one AND save yourselves £10.00 on the 2004 price."...
1) If they REALLY miscalculate the price by 25%, they deserve to go
bust.
2) alternatively, do they really think I am stupid? Theoretical
scenario:
a) Announce big expensive kit
b) Get surprisingly enthusiastic response from modellers
c) Decide to screw them while they can.....
Comments, anyone?
N
Reply to
Nigel Cheffers-Heard
Loading thread data ...
I want it anyway! So I'm a sucker.
-John
Reply to
Pacific95
And what would you rather the alternative be,"1)": Revell to go bust and not produce anything?
Modelers need to get real and understand that this is a business not their personal cheap toy factory. If the price is too low due to miscalculation then it must be raised in order to make a 'profit'. That might be a dirty word in the UK, but it is still the only way we will see new releases next year.
Too many of you do not understand the economics of the current market. Mold making companies raise their prices whenever they feel they can put it to the manufacturers. Same is true for the companies who shoot the plastic, make the decals, etc. Why do you think many companies are looking to China for molds? Because the South Korean companies have figured out they can hold Revell, AMTech, etc over the barrel and demand higher prices. And China is not too far behind given the cost of the rather poor products (wrt accuracy) that are coming from Trumpeter.
Last but not least let's look at the relative cost of kit prices in the UK. Limited distribution, one BIG retailer, demand that is NOT price elastic. Sounds like a great market to sell into. And, the manufacturer only gets 30% or less to cover ALL their costs. The rest go to the distributor and retailer.
Finally, I have a test shot of the U-Boat and it is indeed a very large, thick hull molding with excellent deck and conning tower detail. I congratulate Revell on the initial success of the kit. 10,000 pieces is a great start on paying back the cost of the molding. Another 20 or 30,000 shots sold and they might pay for it.
The reason for the 10,000 initial limit is that the molds would not arrive in Poland in time for the December release so the first 10,000 were shot in China and then the molds were shipped.
If it is too expensive then don't buy it. The price will eventually drop if the kits do not sell, but in this case I would not bet on that happening for quite a while.
Bill S.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nigel Cheffers-Heard" Newsgroups: rec.models.scale Sent: Tuesday, 02 December, 2003 01:40 Subject: Revell U-Boat
Reply to
Nav
am curious. Ideas as to what the lead time would be for a kit this size. Did Revell decide to make a kit of this size, 1-3-5 years ago? Just wondering what the decision process, etc to make such a model.
Craig
Reply to
Craig
What scale is this model? When did it come out? Jerry 47
Reply to
jerry 47
totally OT, but if your into sci-fi, this is kind of kewl. saw a model on some webpage. it had the rear of the u boat model, a piece of glass with painting on it, and the seaquest, from the the show seaquest. rather kewl kitbash. it looked like the ship entered a vortx and was transformed. just another idea as to why to buy the model, again.
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
formatting link
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Reply to
jack
its 1/72, about a yard long. not out yet. can preorder at Squadron now.
jerry 47 wrote:
Reply to
Craig
I suggest, from the above quote, that it is yourself who does not understand business/economics.
Profitable businesses understand that professionalism (includes basic competence among other characteristics) is key to retaining customers who provide the profit.
Professional companies around the world track costs, generate pricing plans, etc. BEFORE release, not after. If they don't, they have bigger problems.
My question is, is the manufacturer really at fault, or are retailers striking while they can?
Reply to
SamVanga
Craig,
It is usually about a three year lead time from initial look to final kit for the larger companies. This is just a ballpark estimate based on my limited experience from the outside looking in.
I helped AMT with the -135 series and it took about two years plus from initial idea to develop the background and build the pitch, sell the kit to the company decision makers, gather the info, decide on the versions to kit, gather the info, make the drawings, cut the molds, produce everything else and begin production and distribution. The final version was finally put out by AMTech, a good 10 years after the molds for all the -135 versions were done.
I would guess that Revell GmbH (formerly Revell AG) are now deciding on the 2005 production schedule and looking at possible releases for 2006-2007. 2004 is on the sked and will be announced at Nurnberg Toy Fair and other venues early next year.
The Type VIIC U-Boat is in 1/72. Check the Revell.de website, it's been there for months.
Bill
Reply to
Nav
It was also announced just over a year ago. I originally ordered these for my store in September 2002. The first one in is still mine.
Dave Henk Hobby Oasis
Reply to
Dave Henk
It's neither the retailers nor the distributors at fault here. The price quoted was the wrong one. When I saw the original $25 US MSRP I knew it was wrong. What appears to have happened is that the Manufacturers agent sent along the incorrect price to the distributors and had to issue a correction after it was noted. It only take one error on a fax to do this. Four of my distributors all had the same incorrect pricing and all four have recently changed it to the $50 dollar figure. One of my distributors still has the original wholesale cost two weeks after correcting the retail. I waiting to see how much longer before they catch on. There buyer is the one who needs to correct this in there database. This has happened before and was never a conspiracy or otherwise attempt to manipulate the modeling public. It's a screw up plain and simple. Standard computer "garbage in garbage out".
Dave Henk Hobby Oasis
Reply to
Dave Henk
I see what you are saying, and I wholeheartedly agree that to keep going they need to make a profit. No argument there. The point I am making, eloquently put by SamVanga, is that you need customer trust and professionalism. A company with this track record shouldn't be making cockups of this magnitued. It simply breeds distrust that we are being screwed just because the opportunity presented itself. You yourself said that the lead time is enormous, and fixing the target price point is a very early part of that process, so I still do not entirely buy the "Oooops, we got it wrong" scenario. Still ooks like opportunism to me.
As for your cheap jibe about profit "might be a dirty word in the UK", let me say one thing to you....
ENRON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I rest my case. N
Reply to
Nigel Cheffers-Heard
That will never happen sadly......
Never forget being in my favorite shop, and getting into a discussion with a couple of local club IPMS members. We all talked about what we were building, and than I raise dthe subject of what they were going to buy today. The both replied that they were just looking at the kit's seeing which ones they were interested in, and than were going home to order off the net. How nice for the pricks..... (said within earshot of sales people)
Go to a show sometime, and see how fast grown men get into pissing contests over the price of a $30 kit !!!!!!!!! It's unreal.......................
"Only a Gentleman can insult me, and a true Gentleman never will..."
Reply to
Azzz1588
I don't see what you're all upset about.
Let me see if I have this right...
Revell announced a huge kit for an unbelievably low price; a price so low that there was discussion here, and elsewhere on the net, about what a ridiculously good deal it was. Then Revell has higher costs than anticipated and raises the price, but since they already have orders for the initial run, decide to honor the initial price for those orders.
Sounds to me like they are giving everyone a fair deal. If they had increased the price on the orders they already had I could see where one would get the perception of dishonesty, but they didn't do that.
FWIW Enron wasn't about making a profit. In fact their problems lie in the fact that they really couldn't make a profit. In short Enron was just about fraud.
John Benson ------------------------ IPMS El Paso Web Guy
formatting link
Reply to
John Benson
Somebody (Ken Laye?) made a hell of a lot of money at the expense of a lot of other folk. Seems to me the terms "profit" and "fraud" are becoming interchangeable these days... N
Reply to
Nigel Cheffers-Heard
I haven't followed the specific model in discussion so I don't know the specific history.
If they are honoring the original price good for them.
If costs go up over time, well, inflation, new taxes, etc. happen. However, I hold that "oops, we made a mistake and forgot to carry the two" (or the equivalant) is not professional and should not be tolerated by customers.
Fair enough.
AMEN! And, it is a pity more can't be done to punish, severely, the fraudsters.
Reply to
SamVanga
Only in same circles. Sadly, those circles seem to keep expanding.
Reply to
SamVanga
Well, I can definately appreciate a mistake (I know I'm not perfect, my models prove that if nothing else).
However, I am still surprised that such a fundemental error was not corrected within hours given its importance. I go back to my earlier comments about professionalism.
Reply to
SamVanga
I saw it I wasn't surprised as I assumed it was an error. I never expected to see it for that price, and wasn't shocked or upset when it was more.
Tom
Reply to
Tom Hiett
"Nav" wrote in message
If one were cynical one could suggest this was the reason for your biased comments, quite hard to criticise a kit when you've been given a freebie, as I well know.
Steve
Reply to
Fleet Air Arm SIG

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.