snipped-for-privacy@charter.net wrote
"So, why wasn't proof of destruction offered, if as you say the weapons were destroyed? Why ~did~ he sacrifice his regieme? It didn't have to come to war (and would not have), if the weapons were truly destroyed."
So as not to appear weak to the ethnic majorities like the Kurds and the Shiit marsh arabs in South Iraq and the Iranians as well.
"If Resolution 1441 called for destruction of weapons, and that destruction was carried out, why allow your country to be ravaged by failing to offer proof?"
Because they determined that it was better to keep, their opponents guessing as to whether thay still had a chemical/biological retaliatory capacity then to let them know they didn't.
They never cared what the US or the UN thought. They know they can't win against them. They do care what the Kurd, Shiite and Iranians think.
Eric