I've noticed of late that media types seem convinced that we ought to refer to methanol-burning internal combustion engines as "nitro" engines. A recent thread posted by someone who came here from R/C cars uses this term, and it somehow doesn't sit well with me. Am I being just too damned curmudgeonly, or does the term bother others of you? To be sure, most of us in the USA use fuel with a bit of nitromethane in it, but that in no way qualifies the engines as primarily "nitro" burners..
This seems to me to be another Madison Avenue catch phrase, just as "turbo" was a few years ago. Everything from vacuum cleaners to toothpaste got the meaningless word fragment, "turbo" stuck on it. Yes, vacuum cleaners employ a turbine, as does your Chevy's water pump. Are these silly ploys due to public ignorance, or to advertiser's mendacity, or...?
Geoff