Agreed! I've had a 15" 1600x1200 laptop for a couple of years. That display beats *any* 17" display and comes close to the 21" CRT next to it at the same resolution. Remember, an LCD display has *no* geometric distortion (linearity is a biggie for schematics and waveforms).
message
I like it! snipped-for-privacy@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org I usually make it snipped-for-privacy@theangrylittledickwithears.org He is usually so INTO telling us all that we don't read his posts correctly that he doesn't even notice that he missed the play on his mung......And hey....I too would like to know where he got his so called "impressive" degree in Moronology!
A 19" that can do at least 1600x1200 at 100Hz? That's at *least* what it would take to replace a good 17" LCD (though I don't know where your prices come from). Remember, LCD screen sizes aren't rated the same way as CRT displays. A 15" LCD is almost the same size as a 17" CRT.
They are fast enough, except for some anal gamers.
As usual, you haven't a what you're talking about. TFT displays do *not* flicker. I am very sensitive to flicker and have never been offended by my laptop's display.
You are a total asswipe, or hasn't your mother told you yet?
Only a tripple DimBulb post, Bush. You must try harder.
Still laughing Keith, Dimbulb hasn't a ray of intelligence... I would venture to guess that there is a "bad connection" upstairs!
Ross, you mean like Tutamongus?
message
You're on a roll tonight Keith.....still laughing!
Damned Ross! You got me here. Can we exterminate both top posting and DimBulb in one act?
On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 03:12:19 GMT, "Ross Mac" Gave us:
Do you actually expect anyone to believe that your post which I responded to was anything other than what you describe?
I have yet to see even ONE valid response from you on ANY point, you retarded bastard.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:24:35 -0500, Keith R. Williams Gave us:
Don't seem surprised when I have that drink.
message
You continue to make my point! You just post your vitreolic rhetoric and never answer a direct question... Why do you think you are known as DimBulb? Could it be your prophetic posts ? .....And hey where did you get your degree in Moronology?
Yeah, have another drink....Now there's a surprise! That should UP your sub-human IQ huh!!!
Show me the written rules for posting and I will follow them. BTW I am not using usenet...so you will have to post the nonusenet rules.
On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 03:37:19 GMT, "B J Conner" Gave us:
It figures that you're a racist bastard as well. Damn shame that one of them didn't get you, Conner. Your E-1 grade mentality is lame, just like your posts are.
On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 03:57:51 GMT, "Ross Mac" Gave us:
You're both retarded. He didn't even spell the guy's name right.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:46:09 -0500, Keith R. Williams Gave us:
Since LCD displays are still not at 1600 x 1200, I doubt that that is your resolution.
What brand of laptop? I have seen nothing over 1280 x 1024.
Well?
It beats nothing if the images are moving. As far as CRT linearity goes, the CRTs made in the PC industry are at their pinnacle.
If you get weary eyed because of a schematic line not being absolutely "straight" you have bigger problems than your lack of ability to gauge monitor features.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:51:20 -0500, Keith R. Williams Gave us:
Can you mis-interpret a posted remark any worse?
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:54:11 -0500, Keith R. Williams Gave us:
Oh boy... You never having seen any flicker makes you an expert... NOT!
No. She did tell me that you were though.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:55:01 -0500, Keith R. Williams Gave us:
How should we evaluate your little retarded assessment posts then?
You couldn't be a much more retarded Usenet poster. I'm sure you'll try though.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.