action: clean house

Oh, yeah?!? Well my opinion of your opinion of his opinion of your opinion... Ummm, well, where was I?

David ERbas-White

Alex Mericas wrote:

Reply to
David Erbas-White
Loading thread data ...

You beat me to it.

;-)

Reply to
Kurt Kesler

Better to add the original SB 724 as a small piece of bacon to a much larger bipartisan bill with one of those names that sounds really important but means nothing. Or perhaps as a replacement for PATRIOT-II :-)

Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!

Reply to
Bob Kaplow

Acknowledged and expected. Wouldn't it be cool if somehow we could at least see each other's perspective to reasonably agree or disagree with?

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Jerry Irvine wrote:

Reply to
RayDunakin

And the only rocket organization to discuss it with either DOJ or ATF or any senator or congressman was TRA/NAR's Kyte.

Further they got the figure from a NAR President web notice we believe.

In addition both on the web and in meetings NAR has clearly stated they would be willing to compromise on mass limits, not understanding or perhaps not caring we are talking USC not CFR here or even more meaningless, NFPA or NAR.

So when I criticize NAR I cite SPECIFIC grounds.

Jerry

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

not without a little help, it wasn't

- iz

RayDunak> That 0.9lb figure was dredged up by ATF from something entirely unrelated that

Reply to
Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.