Is there another rocketry forum?

Iz I couldn't care less about your killfile. You post 50 paragraphs of crap when 2 sentences will do the trick.

Reply to
Shot Locker
Loading thread data ...

ah, no. I post substantive argument with references, which you do not

but your remark is interesting, as you are certainly spending some effort trying to circumvent someone's killfile

how many of these are yours?

snipped-for-privacy@debra.net snipped-for-privacy@debra.net snipped-for-privacy@aussie.au snipped-for-privacy@aussie.au snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.au snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.uk snipped-for-privacy@frenchroast.net snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.net snipped-for-privacy@netscape.net

- iz

Reply to
Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed

No one is "un-invited" to TRF, not even Jerry.

If I'm not mistaken (jerry, please tell me if I am), Jerry *chooses* not to participate in TRF *because* it is moderated. And that's fine. It's the beauty of it all, we can have both (and more) to satify the needs, wants and desires of (hopefully) all.

If you want to truely speak your mind and say *anything* under the sun, then rmr is the best place to be. If you want to stay focused and have out of focus discussion stopped (judgement calls, if you will), then a moderated forum may be what you want. Is it "perfect"? Nope. May not always agree with what a moderator decides. But then, I don't always agree with what the cop, or judge or ATF decides either. If one doesn't like the way it runs, they are as welcome to leave as they are to join up. Few leave and more and more are joining up every day.

but "boring"? Not even close.

jim

David We> Jerry Irv>

Reply to
jflis (FlisKits)

That is true. The question implies that this is a rocket discussion forum when it is not. If you want a rocket discussion forum, where rockets are actually discussed, several good ones have already been posted. Implying censorship is a bad thing is like saying a spam blocker is a bad thing because it weeds out crap.

Reply to
default

Reply to
John Stein

Reply to
tater schuld

Interesting. There never was a plastic nose cone for BT-70. In fact the only classic BT-70 nose cone was balsa, and it was never part of ANY kit. The closest to a BT-70 nose cone included in a kit was the Apollo capsule used on the S-IB and LJII.

Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!

Reply to
Bob Kaplow

Reply to
Bob Kaplow

Shrox and Apogee are buddies. Are these the same cone or different?

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Doh! Busted! Yep'ers kids, it's true. Get ready. You've got a little time to prepare...

shrox

Reply to
shrox

It is a desperately needed cone. Send me a sample when you get a chance.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Jerry Irvine wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@corp.supernews.com:

Why don't you just buy a few like the rest of us?

len.

Reply to
Leonard Fehskens

Because I am a bulk buyer and friends.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.