Same Old BS Finally Equals Kill File

WHen I read it, I thought it couldn't be what actually transpired. Then I spoke to some that were there & they told me it was all true. Then I read the DOT stuff and there it was all over again.

Reply to
Phil Stein
Loading thread data ...

How about [FT] [JI] that's a flame thread about Jerry Irvine.

Reply to
Phil Stein

It sounds just like what I read in the DOT paper so I believe it. TRA and DOT couldn't be conspiring against you.

Poor Jerry.

Reply to
Phil Stein

You seem to be confused, Dave. This isn't about how to avoid being "hassled by the fuzz". It's about whether or not Jerry is lying when he says the ATF told him he can manufacture rocket motors commercially without ATF permits.

However, if you don't want to avoid being hassled by the fuzz, that's fine with me. You and Jerry can thumb your nose at them all you want. Go ahead, dare them to hassle you! No one's stopping you.

It does seem odd though, that you would link legal "hassles" with a request for proof of Jerry's claim. Could it be that you too, do not believe he is telling the truth?

s
Reply to
raydunakin

Jerry, how long ago were you put on notice by TRA? Over 7 years? Why do you find it suprising that no one still had a copy of your first hearing? You had your chance to "play nice" with the TRA when you asked for re-instatement, and the record of how you approached it was documenting in the TR!

You wanted TRA to just readmit you, as in your mind you'd done no wrong, but when asked questions relating to your own activity, all you did was dodge the questions! (like you do on RMR and did on ROL before you got banned in the forums there!)

Start telling the truth, and TRA might allow you back in, and maybe TRA or NAR will certifiy your motors (given proper paperwork and a check that doesn't bounce!)

Reply to
AZ Woody

snip

Yeah, there's a lot of blather here... but there is at times... amidst the fodder.....some truly funny stuff.

Randy

Reply to
<randyolb

Even if they DIDN'T follow the regs, I would have gone through channels to enforce their following of them.

You know.

Unlike AT, TRA, AMW, etc, etc.

Apparantly not.

Jerry

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Because there was no such hearing despite many requests.

Nope. That was pure propoganda.

If it was at least related to reality I would admit it and address it on substance (as I always do).

You know, like when I ship "model aircraft parts" and am accused of shipping Potassium Permanganate.

For example.

The stated 3 year term had passed. Several times.

Does your mother STILL rape children every night?

That form of question?

Jerry

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

LOL!!

How about when you shipped rocket motors and called them "model aircraft parts"?

e
Reply to
raydunakin

Yes. Then.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Equally as good :-)

Reply to
Niall Oswald

What an asshole you are.

Reply to
Phil Stein

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.