Iraqi dissidents wave model plane

Reply to
jeboba
Loading thread data ...

Here we go with the left media. Check out who owns 75% of the American media. You will find they are FAR RIGHT CONSERVATIVES. Rush keeps telling you about the liberal press to keep you brainwashed. AND I read everything. every word. It's amazing to me how you can read the same words and get a totally opposite meaning. Turn Rush off! He and O'Reilly have gotten inside your head and scrambled your brain.

Reply to
jeboba

Is that a matter of dogma, with you, then?

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

I'm pretty sure it was a Kadet .40 with flaps which, as we know, is capable of carrying a 40 lb. payload. Even more if it had a wing.

MJC

Reply to
MJC

The Natural Philosopher posted message IDon Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:55:42

+0100

Pretty much. Liberals I have known over the years say the darndest things. They intentionally twist the facts and make up stuff out of thin air. They subscribe to the Joseph Goebbles school of 'Invent the lie and repeat it often enough and it becomes the truth' propaganda. They do so often enough that I pretty much demand solid evidence to support anything a liberal says. Lacking such evidence, (as liberals usually do) I dismiss them out of hand.

Reply to
Todd Klondike

I don't thing our military has much fear of a garishly colored prop hovering trick plane. They would be more worried about someone spending less money and time to get a RPG and launch it from where the goofball with the RC TX is standing.

My toy airplane doesn't have the 30+ foot wing span of an armed UAV such as the Predator, or even an unarmed Hercules. If I had the budget for one, I could also make a missle or a really nasty bomb and cause some pretty nasty damage to an unsuspecting enemy. But if I had the brains, budget and time to make such a destructive weapons system, I would not be the whack job rag head Allah praising, Al Queda type you seem so scared of.

Hmmm.. You ever wonder why its a recon aircraft, and not armed? Do you think the thought crossed anyones mind before? They are not effective. Until you scale 'em up in size and complexity, they are not suitable weapons platforms. Once they are effective, they are either an unmanned jet fighter, or they are a cruise missle. Either one aint being built in any of our dinky little RC workshops.

Reply to
Sisyphus

By decree of C.O.Jones, RC'ers will now need to register with the BATF to obtain a license to build toy airplanes. Hurry 'for the terrorists gets us all!

Reply to
Sisyphus

Does Tower Hobbies deliver to Iraq ? If so any numbskull with a credit card and an address can buy an RC airplane. Making a weapon out of the thing is another story. I'll bet that for the $500 it would take to get a trainer and all the accesories to fly it any terrorist could do alot more damage with other more easily obtained weapons designed and built for military use.

Reply to
Oper8 On U

Gee, just like Shrub? So, where are the WMDs? That IS why we went to war, isn't it?

Reply to
Paul McIntosh

Yes, but scurrying along the ground without a wing ensures it is harder to detect..... stealth fuselage ???

Reg

Reply to
reg

Ah... sanity comes to the discussion at last.

Who is going to prat about with a dinky toy plane when you can make a

1,000 pound car bomb ?

Some of you guys would be better selling your hobby gear and investing in the tools to dig a shelter so you can park your quaking asses in it.

Reg

Reply to
reg

Thats the keyword........ supposed. It was supposed, nay even assumed, that they were also being fed from creditable and upto-date intelligence sources..... Bwahahaha

Lets recap..... Iraq has weapons of mass destruction............. Bwahahaha Iraq is supporting and in league with Al Qaeda.... Bwahahaha Iraq was involved in 9-11................ Bwahahahahaha

Reg

Reply to
reg

"Paul McIntosh" posted message IDon Mon, 21 Jun 2004

20:20:59 +0100

Wanna know where they're at? Here's a cl00 for you:

http://216.26.163.62/2004/me_iraq_06_11.html Also, note how conveniently you neglect to note that Liberals, including Slick Willie and John F'ing Kerry were also talking about Iraq's WMD in the past. Naw...let's blame it all on George, instead.

Thank you for proving my point.

Reply to
Todd Klondike

Well I don't know what Liberal means in the USA, over here it means someone who stands either for a particular party (the Liberal Democrats) of indeterminate status, or someone who believes that choices are things people should by and large make for themselves, not have government make for them.

What you are describing sounds more like the Republican party and especially the Neo conservative wing, as far I can tell.

To be a politician is to be a convincing liar. The most dangerous are those who believe in their own lies.

watch out.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

*In the past*, they actually has some.

I notice the US deficit topped out at a record high last week, The country now owes more people more money than at any time in history.

Gas has never been more expensive.

The markets are sliding. (Must sell em short)

The dollar is sliding.

And it took the Saudis to actually catch someone from Al Qaeda. Well fairs fair, most of them are Saudis anyway.

After flattening Iraq it took several months to find one babbling old man in a bunker.

Great. Really great. That's my sort of president.

Sieg bloody Rumsfeld.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

BINGO!

Reply to
Six_O'Clock_High

Or stuff from the grocery store down the street.

Reply to
Six_O'Clock_High

Well actually I try to read as much as possible from all source's and make a reasonable effort at sorting out the bull, and if you actually read a good bit of information from many source's it's really not that difficult to sort out the bull. The sad part is that no one is telling the whole truth. I don't belong to any political party, and you can bet I'm going to vote for the people that I can see doing the country the most good. Now while I attempt to do all this without loosing my cool, I refuse to become panic stricken by every little thing that comes down the pike.

Don't worry so much about the right and the left and keep an eye on the fence riders in the middle. Don't let it get ya all wound up it'll choke ya. After all we got the best politican's money can buy, and the drug companies and the insurance companies already own most of them.

tomb

Reply to
tomb046

Strange. I'm a liberal and I use the same analogy with Goebels to explain the Bush administration's propaganda campaign. The biggest difference is, no one has proved the liberals are lieing but the whole world has proved Bush is lieing. Goebels methods work real well on you!

Reply to
jeboba

Reply to
jeboba

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.