Iraqi dissidents wave model plane

Jun 19, 2004 340 Replies

Paul,

Fact, a friend of mine has pictures of himself posing with several Scuds his Marine unit captured in Iraq in this last war. Now they're not WMD but, they were on the great UN "mustn't have" list since the first war.

So how is it Saddam had them? Can you explain it?

Why couldn't the inspectors find these things? Or the satellites? It's not like they're small or anything. What else might he have had?

Come on Paul! What's the reason here?

And BTW, the data plates stated they were manufactured since the first war!

Sounds like P.S. (Paul Sh*$#) to me!

You would certainly be the one to recognize that now wouldn't you?

More P.S.

Who you talking to here Paul?

As opposed to your fanatical following of a bunch of fanatics?

Chuck, Proud member of the vast right wing conspiracy!

I doubt it. To cut something, you need close proximity and a directional blast. The pressure required to blow an average house down is not going to come from 5lbs.

"Paul McIntosh" posted message IDon Wed, 23 Jun 2004

07:44:47 +0100

If you want me to read something, post it, or a link to it, here. Otherwise, it's just more unsupported allegations.

The Natural Philosopher posted message IDon Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:26:06

+0100

In that case, I'd say he got what he asked for.

"Paul McIntosh" posted message IDon Wed, 23 Jun 2004

08:05:09 +0100

Nonsense, moron. Your inept handling of your newsreader (Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000) places all quoted text below your signature deliminator. Anyone quoting you automatically loses everything after the sig deliminator. Your inability to handle your newsreader is not my fault. Just like your inability to satisfy the requirements of a credit institution is not President Bush's fault.

"Paul McIntosh" posted message IDon Wed, 23 Jun 2004

08:02:59 +0100

"Materials to produce" does not equal "tons of WMD". Please try to say what you mean.

"Paul McIntosh" posted message IDon Wed, 23 Jun 2004

07:40:36 +0100

Idiot. The winner of the election was not clear until December.

"Paul McIntosh" posted message IDon Wed, 23 Jun 2004

07:42:21 +0100

I shall try to be more precise, as you apparently are easily confused.

"Paul McIntosh" posted message IDon Wed, 23 Jun 2004

08:08:17 +0100

Because they were moved, dope.

Your precious 'paragraph 4' states that "...he did not believe that the Survey Group had sufficient information and insight at that time to make final judgments..." Nothing in there prohibiting preliminary findings.

Is waving a protest or celebration? Do they wave the guns in protest and shoot them in celebration? Seems backwards to me.

Is waving a protest or celebration? Do they wave the guns in protest and shoot them in celebration? Seems backwards to me.

Despite the constant lies from ABCCBSNBC Bush's approval rating gets barely below 50% and I don't think he has ever been below Kerry in polls of most likely voters. Always pops right back up after every manufactured scandal. I suspect Bush will be back in November.

You like when Clinton bombed an asprin factory to get rid of Osama?

Lots of documents of destroyed WMD's in the months just before our invasion. Jordan found some they believe came from Seria. Some serin shells were used against our troops, fortunately they malfunctioned. So the WMD's exist or at least existed.

The existance of WMD's is not that important, the capability to manufacture is. They found warehouses full of insectacides near chemical manufacturing facilities, just the thing you would use to manufacture serin and VX.

But the liberal press doesn't report this.

He said we should prevent Iraq from becoming an immanent threat. The lying liberals twisted that statement around 180 degrees.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required