ROL NEWS--AeroTech Announces Certification of Three New Reload Kits

BS

One step at a time. The ATF is still balking at even the most restrictive interpretation of the judge's ruling.

Reply to
RayDunakin
Loading thread data ...

I wrote:

Reply to
RayDunakin

Where do you get this information? And with the judge's ruling, does it _matter_ what ATF actually says? (We won an important point over them in court... do we have to "make them say uncle" too?)

-dave w

Reply to
David Weinshenker

OK, what's the difference between someone who makes motors to sell to his buddies (with such permits as may actually be required) and a "manufacturer"?

-dave w

Reply to
David Weinshenker

You have no clue.

But at least you post anyway!!

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

He cannot comprehend.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

God bless me.

Or should I say I bless me.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Yes, there was a lot of anger in the hobby towards Vulcan over that incident, and rightly so.

At the time, DOT did not require shipping approval for what they considered to be a flammable solid. It wasn't until after this video incident that they changed their rules and made it harder to ship APCP.

Bull. Vulcan had no reloadables at that time.

More BS. The original Vulcan delays used something called "SCID cord". John Davis (Gary's partner in Composite Dynamics) worked out the formula for AT delays, a formula which has since been adapted by other manufacturers including Vulcan.

Vulcan had the first red-flame propellent (Hellfire), that much is true. But it wasn't the same formula as Redlines, and has a much less vivid coloration.

You mean everyone except the ATF. They still haven't officially accepted the judge's ruling, much less agreed that it applies to manufacturers.

Reply to
RayDunakin

Quit replying to yourself, Jerry.

Reply to
RayDunakin

Correct. Also, this is something that AT had in the works for a long time, and already had casings made for the new loads.

Reply to
RayDunakin

A commercial facility.

Reply to
Dave Grayvis

That does not result in motor certs. Even when the authorities approve the facility.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

No

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

No there wasn't. There was anger on the part of the NFPA sport rocket caucus. 10 guys or less.

Not.

Total bullshit.

Not that YOU are aware of as a CONSUMER.

Ask experts.

Nope.

You are simply full of crap.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Learn to read. The question was; "OK, what's the difference between someone who makes motors to sell to his buddies (with such permits as may actually be required) and a "manufacturer"?

No One said anything about motor certs.

Reply to
Dave Grayvis

NFPA-1127

plonk.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

The ATF said there was a 62.5g limit until we got the judge to slap their hands for illegal rulemaking.

Reply to
RayDunakin

I'm glad to see you finally admit this, Mr. Model Aircraft Parts.

Reply to
RayDunakin

Prove it.

Reply to
RayDunakin

Dave W. wrote:

Reply to
RayDunakin

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.