A hacker at work? IP 80.46.128.141

Grow up, OM

You are not right because you are wrong in what you asserted.

Grow up, OM. There is never any need to resort to silly and childish forms of self-expression such as you do below. To do so indicates that your place is still in the school playground.

There is no value in diverting a technical and/or legal discussion into a slanging match, especially in an international forum. If you do so, it reflects badly on you as a debater, and does nothing to further healthy discussion.

Shame on you.

Thanks.

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 08:10:08 GMT, "art" Gave us:

With the right emulator, one can install Windows2000Pro in a Linux DOS VDM, and the OS installation doesn't even know it. After, one can run any DOS or windows app.

Hell, ya prolly could even install XP, and it would be transparent.(not that I want to... or don't).

When Linux nd Open Source becomes king, and it will, Windows servers will be run in emulators on 64 bit Athlon Linux boxes until the entire enterprise gets up and running under Linux boxes.

IBM Corp is embracing Linux a lot, so I am hard pressed to find fault with the vision of the big boys.

Bill deserves a hit. I see a day when per station OSes from him sell for less than $75 each.

Application softwares, of course, will still command the same pricing they currently have, but I personally feel that is a bit high as well. Artificially inflated by Billy.

I am pleased to see that you have put aside your short trousers, and assumed the mantle of adulthood. There was not one single infantile outburst in what you posted below.

Keep up the good work, and, who knows, you might even get the respect that, by your previous style, you are desperate to have.

There's a good boy!

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:33:42 -0000, "Airy R. Bean" Gave us:

F*ck you, wussy boy.

This I get from a top posting, Usenet twit that refuses even to follow the posting protocols of the forum which he interlopes his lame ass into.

Get a clue, dipshit. You are the one that needs to pop respect.

Much less evident under the present regime than it was in the days of Franco. The police are much scruffier now, too!

No doubt to prevent the British lager/tequila louts from straying out of their compound. ;-)

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:36:24 -0000, "Airy R. Bean" Gave us:

Face it, retard boy... You shirked on at least five points made on the net, and you fall FLAT on your lame, wussy boy protester face on the POW issue.

You couldn't answer to your incorrect assertions OR you flat out lies about Japan, Germany, and the US' war time POW handling practices.

You be lame. You are a Major at least. Hell, you could be a Captain, or a Colonel... You may even be a General Lamer.

On the contrary, he is perfectly correct about the so-called "POW issue". Bush has consistently stated that the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay are not Prisoners of War, and therefore are not protected by the terms of the Geneva Convention.

You can't have it both ways.

Who's been watching too many 'B' movies, then? ;-)

Can't you see you're playing right into his hands by cussin' at him. It makes you look small.

It's not an issue of playing into hands.

I would be satisfied with polite discussion even if the discussers did not agree with me.

Grow up, OM. And you were doing so well!

Shame!

Grow up, OM. You were doing so well, but now you have regressed back to infantility.

There's always hope for your future, and if it is a future of maturity, coupled with remorse for you rather silly stance, then you may even become a well-respected member of the community.

Go on, young man, you know you can do it!

I have 5 PCs in a LAN. The Linux box works as web server, email server, DNS server, hacking toys etc. Outlook Express is running on one of my Windows PCs.

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:07:14 -0000, "Airy R. Bean" Gave us:

No. You can't handle being intellectually or technically bitch slapped.

Then, you use that as an excuse for NOT responding to the discussion.

All this AFTER refusing to even learn how to post correctly.

"Airy R. Bean, village idiot, now also a broadband expert" scrawled drunkenly on a yellow post-it stuck to the Job Centre window in message news:brjts0$43as4$ snipped-for-privacy@ID-217727.news.uni-berlin.de...

Did you ever go to skool? Let's break this down - it's not as difficult as you seem to think.

e^(-jwt) = 1/(e^jwt) - OK so far?

If t increases e^jwt will also increase - OK so far?

If e^jwt increases 1/(e^jwt) will DECREASE

Which part of that is giving you a problem, or are the rules of mathematics different on your planet?

...(_!_)...

Not at all. If you would be so good as to apologise for your insulting outbursts (which only serve to make you look rather silly and infantile; it takes no effort on my part; you do it so well) and also undertake to behave in a manner both befitting a person of your age and also a public forum, then, after it is apparent that you have done this and also kept to it, then I will be more than happy to deal with the points, erroneous as it happens, that you have raised.

Over to you, OM, (but until then I think that I have more than satisfied your patent desire to seek attention by childish outbursts).....

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in news:brjts5$43as4$ snipped-for-privacy@ID-217727.news.uni-berlin.de:

I repeat, I did, years back. Judging by your inane ramblings, I think it is you who need to.

We are still waiting for these logs of all these alleged port scans that you have been invited to post, or are they as fictional as the rest of your postings.

Geoff