NO, Iz did NOT write...
Duane Phillips did. But since you cropped half the other stuff anyhow to put your spin on it, I guess that point is moot, eh?
Never. But ARSA's members pay no fees either, therefore the ENTIRE idea is supported by volunteer work, unlike NAR and TRA, therefore, they don't compare.
Exactly my point... what of it?
Here, we get to your spin doctoring again. This isn't about what I want, it is about your trying to compare ARSA to TRA on an organizational level.
Nice spin... NOT. This statement wasn't about PEOPLE going away. It was about their right to complain when they have vested something into it. Spin again.
On this point, I withdraw my statement of "thousands", as quite frankly, I do not know. I have seen enough said to know that many have, but I cannot say with any degree knowlege exactly how many are current members, nor how many are pending. But go ahead, make it look like a small insignificant dictator's rumor-mill. It will only serve to make you look smaller and more insignificant.
I will modify and reiterrate, that is was their views on the regulation of consumer rocketry, that enticed me to join, and many others of which I _do_ know.
You are really searching, and it is showing. They have a safety code, that allows people to enjoy the hobby, not restrict them from it. I noted the point that is different right there above where you ignored it. There is a difference in what is allowed... but go ahead, ignore it again.
First, I didn't explicitly say TRA. But I have WRT NAR. However, NAR seems to look past it now especially since many of their members belong to more than one organization.
Yes, it is well known that the freedom to not fly motors which are not on TRA or NAR cert. lists is well documented.
~ Duane Phillips.