ATFE Anti-rocketry Video

Then you erred, badly, in stating "There is no video." as if it were an absolute fact.

Kinda funny that you keep repeating this statement sans evidence, and yet clamor for more evidence about the existence of said video.

Saying that you're basing your conviction upon Jerry's previous failures of prediction does not excuse such irrationality :)

I myself find it mildly ironic that my figures about the effects of launching a salvo of twelve J's from within a van came so close to being "tested" by the ATF... although the salvo was supposed to immediately leave the area of the van and _not_ hang around... ;)

Reply to
Chuck Stewart
Loading thread data ...

Reply to
Alex Mericas

Saying I will revoke my earlier statements if proven wrong is hardly clamoring. Why would I WANT to be proven wrong? My friend told me I wasn't.

Reply to
Alex Mericas

Prove to me there are no more dinosaurs.

Reply to
Nozzlehead

It is interesting that those who claim there is this video out there of a BATFE faux pas can't seem to provide any type of hard evidence. They are now resorting to hearsay.

For now I am putting these believers down as conspiracy theorists. They might also believe we never landed on the moon. These believers perhaps will cross over to being full-fledged nut cases... ranting on a street corner with foil carefully applied to their heads.

Reply to
Nozzlehead

There is no spoon. It is only you that changes.

Alex Mericas wrote:

Reply to
Jeff Taylor

Alleged failures.

You have predictive skills. :)

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

I agree.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Your perfect record of inaccuracy is safe.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Let's be very clear. It is CLASSIFIED. By the GOVERNMENT. Releasing it is a "high crime".

The only reason you even heard about it at all was it was sooo fu*king funny even people with security clearances could not stand NOT telling the story. It was a laugh fest for people normally surrounded by bad stuff in their daily lives. Give them a break.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Interesting which government laws you choose to support. Do you have proof that this event is CLASSIFIED? You're digging deeper.

Well you have no proof to back up your assertions, Jerry. We can let this die as it's becoming more certain such an event (BATFE van fire) never occurred. With each passing day the non-conspiracy theorists are given further proof.

Reply to
Nozzlehead

further evidence would compromise the source, ergo you will not see it

get over it

- iz

Nozzlehead wrote:

Reply to
Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed

Just so happens I do :)

formatting link

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

I find it interesting Nozzlehead is so fixated on offering FUD on this. He has nothing to offer yet criticizes those who actually do. One wonders if he is engaged in an active disinformation campaign himself, and for whom.

Jerry

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

they wouldn't allow a U.S. Senator attend the test because of national security issues

I think that its a good bet it's classified

d0h

- iz

Nozzlehead wrote:

Reply to
Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed

He can't trust that either because unless he heard it personally from the Senator's mouth, it is hearsay.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

What does that prove? That the ATFE purchased 40 G80 motors, any delay.

My source tells me that the REAL purpose of the tests where to show that APCP motors could explode. They INTENDED to destroy the van but it burned instead of exploding. This is to counter the expected re-instroduction of legislation in the new session of Congress.

Don't bother asking. It's classified, I can't tell. If I told you more it would compromise my source.

Reply to
Alex Mericas

I rest my case. I am over it unless you guys come up with some proof.

Reply to
Nozzlehead

Actually, the same company that set up the tests did the fake video from the "moon landing". They also handled the autopsies after the Roswell "incident". The master minds behind the plan are the same ones behind both Kennedy assassinations.

Nozzlehead wrote:

Reply to
Alex Mericas

Nice try Jerry. Nothing in that link suggests that the torched van incident is classified.

You're still unable to prove a thing.

Reply to
Nozzlehead

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.